Volume 13, Issue 11 (12-2015)                   IJRM 2015, 13(11): 711-714 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moein M R, Moein M R, Ghasemzadeh J, Sabeti P, Pourmasoumi S. Evaluation of sperm retrieval rate with bilateral testicular sperm extraction in infertile patients with azoospermia. IJRM. 2015; 13 (11) :711-714
URL: http://journals.ssu.ac.ir/ijrmnew/article-1-604-en.html
1- Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2- Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
Abstract:   (2927 Views)
Background: About 10% to 15% of infertile men have azoospermia, which could be obstructive or non-obstructive. Diagnostic biopsy from the testis and recently testicular sperm extraction (TESE) are the most precise investigations in these patients. Testicular biopsy can be done unilaterally or bilaterally. The worth of unilateral or bilateral testicular biopsy in men with azoospermia is controversial. Objective: To evaluate the necessity of bilateral diagnostic biopsy from the testis in new era of diagnosis and treatment of male infertility. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the results of testis biopsy in 419 azoospermic men, referred to Yazd Research and Clinical Center for Infertility from 2009-2013. Patients with known obstructive azoospermia were excluded from the study. Results: In totally, 254 infertile men (60.6%) were underwent unilateral TESE, which in 175 patients (88.4%) sperm were extracted from their testes successfully. Bilateral testis biopsy was done in 165 patients (39.4%) which in 37 patients (22.4%), sperm were found in their testes tissues. Conclusion: Due to the low probability of positive bilateral TESE results especially when we can’t found sperm in the first side, we recommend that physicians re-evaluate the risk and benefit of this procedure in era of newer and more precise technique of sperm retrieval like micro TESE.
Full-Text [PDF 428 kb]   (197 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (66 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

1. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Geneva: World Health Organization; 5th Ed. 2010.
2. Stephen EH, Chandra A. Declining estimates of infertility in the United States: Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 516-523. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.129]
3. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Evaluation of the azoospermic male. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 574-577.
4. Schlegel PN. Causes of azoospermia and their management. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004; 16: 561-572. [DOI:10.1071/RD03087]
5. Botros RMB Riza, Aziz N, Agarwal A, Edmund Sabanegh JR. Medical and Surgical management of male Infertility. 1st Ed. New Delhi, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2014. [DOI:10.5005/jp/books/11840]
6. Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Nagy P, Ubaldi F, Goossens A, Silber S, et al. Are there any predictive factors for successful testicular sperm recovery in azoospermic patients? Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 80-86. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.1.80]
7. Amer M, Ateyah A, Hany R, Zohdy W. Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 653-656. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/15.3.653]
8. Tournaye H, Camus M, Goossens A, Liu J, Nagy P, Silber S, et al. Recent concepts in the management of infertility because of non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 115-119. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/10.suppl_1.115]
9. Schlegel PN, Su LM. Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1688-1692. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.8.1688]
10. Plas E, Riedl CR, Engelhardt PF, Mühlbauer H, Pflüger H. Unilateral or bilateral testicular biopsy in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol 1999; 162: 2010-2013. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68089-5]
11. Schulze W, Thoms F, Knuth UA. Testicular sperm extraction: comprehensive analysis with simultaneously performed histology in 1418 biopsies from 766 subfertile men. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 82-96. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.suppl_1.82]
12. Friedler S, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Soffer Y, Komarovsky D, Ron-El R. Testicular sperm retrieval by percutaneous needle aspiration compared with testicular sperm extraction by open biopsy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1488-1493. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.7.1488]
13. Schoor RA, Elhanbly S, Niederberger CS, Ross LS. The role of testicular biopsy in the modern management of male infertility. J Urol 2002; 167: 197-200. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65411-0]
14.   14. Dohle GR, Colpi GM, Hargreave TB, Papp GK, Jungwirth A, Weidner W, et al. EAU Working Group on Male Infertility, EAU guidelines on male infertility. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 703-711. [DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.002]
15. Schoysman R, Vanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Segal-Bertin G, van de Casseye M. Successful fertilization by testicular spermatozoa in an in-vitro fertilization program. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1339-1340. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138254]
16. Ramasamy R, Yagan N, Schlegel PN. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology 2005; 65: 1190-1194. [DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.059]
17. Hussein AF. Evaluation of diagnostic testis biopsy and the repetition of testicular sperm extraction surgeries in infertility patients. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 88-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.022]
18. Ramasamy R, Reifsnyder JE, Husseini J, Eid PA, Bryson C, Schlegel PN. Localization of sperm during microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2013; 189: 643-646. [DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.031 ]

© 2021 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb