Volume 4, Issue 1 (7-2006)                   IJRM 2006, 4(1): 23-28 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khademi A, Alleyassin A, Agha-hosseini M, Dadras N, Asghari Roodsari A, Tabatabaeefar L et al . Psychometric properties of Sexual Function Questionnaire: evaluation of an Iranian sample. IJRM. 2006; 4 (1) :23-28
URL: http://journals.ssu.ac.ir/ijrmnew/article-1-48-en.html
1- Infertility Ward, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , afkhademi@sina.tums.ac.ir
2- Infertility Ward, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1293 Views)
Background: Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is a real problem that affects 25-63% of women. There is no valid Persian version of sexual function questionnaire (FSQ).
Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of Persian version of sexual function questionnaire.
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 547 women were questioned by Persian version of SFQ. Factor analysis produced five domains of female sexual function. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and discriminant validity were calculated.
Results: Five-factor structure accounted for 63% of the variance. Arousal-orgasm domain was as same as arousal-sensation, arousal-lubrication, and orgasm domains of the original version. Enjoyment-desire domain was similar to enjoyment and desire domains except one question. Pain and partner domains were consistent with original domains. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and discriminant validity were reasonable in Persian version of SFQ.
Conclusion: Persian version of SFQ is almost valuable and reliable to use for Iranian population with exception of one question. Results of the omitted question from enjoyment domain should interpret separately as unusual sex domain.
Full-Text [PDF 115 kb]   (529 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (150 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

1. DeUgarte CM, Berman L, Berman J. Female Sexual Dysfunction-from Diagnosis to Treatment. Sexuality, Reproduction & Menopause 2004;2:139-145. [DOI:10.1016/j.sram.2004.07.002]
2. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999;281:537-44. [DOI:10.1001/jama.281.6.537]
3. Simons JS, Carey MP. Prevalence of sexual dysfunctions: results from a decade of research. Arch Sex Behav 2001;30:177-219. [DOI:10.1023/A:1002729318254]
4. Hoon EF, Joon PW, Wincze JP. An inventory for the measurement of female sexual arousability: The SAI. Arch Sex Behav 1976;5:269-274. [DOI:10.1007/BF01542081]
5. Spector IP, Carey MP, Steinberg L. The sexual desire inventory: development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. J Sex Marital Ther 1996;22:175-190. [DOI:10.1080/00926239608414655]
6. Thirlaway K, Fallowfield L, Cuzick J. The Sexual Activity Questionnaire: a measure of women's sexual functioning. Qual Life Res 1996;5:81-90. [DOI:10.1007/BF00435972]
7. LoPiccolo J, Steger JC. The sexual interaction inventory: a new instrument for assessment of sexual dysfunction. Arch Sex Behav 1974;3:585-595. [DOI:10.1007/BF01541141]
8. Woody JD, D'Souza HJ. The Sexual Interaction System Scale: a new inventory for assessing sexual dysfunction and sexual distress. J Sex Marital Ther 1994;20:210-228. [DOI:10.1080/00926239408403431]
9. Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The DSFI: a multidimensional measure of sexual functioning. J Sex Marital Ther 1979;5:244-81. [DOI:10.1080/00926237908403732]
10. Mazer NA, Leiblum SR, Rosen RC. The brief index of sexual functioning for women (BISF-W): a new scoring algorithm and comparison of normative and surgically menopausal population. Menopause 2000;5:350-363. [DOI:10.1097/00042192-200007050-00009]
11. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26:191-208. [DOI:10.1080/009262300278597]
12. Symonds T, Boolell M, Quirk F. Development of a questionnaire on sexual quality of life in women. J Sex Marital Ther 2005;31:385-397. [DOI:10.1080/00926230591006502]
13. Quirk FH, Heiman JH, Rosen RC, Laan E, Smith MD, Boolell M. Development of a Sexual Function Questionnaire for Clinical Trials of Female Sexual Dysfunction. J Womens Health Gend based Med 2002; 11:277-289 [DOI:10.1089/152460902753668475]
14. Basson R, Berman J, Burnett A, Derogatis L, Ferguson D, Fourcroy J, et al. Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications. J Urol 2000;163:888-893. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67828-7]
15. Bullinger M, Power MJ, Aaronson NK, Cella DF, Anderson RT. Creating and Evaluating Cross-Cultural Instruments. in: Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Edited by Spilker B. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996;659-668.
16. Nunnally JC, Bernstien IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd edition. New York:McGraw-Hill ;1994.
17. Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 2005;31:1-20. [DOI:10.1080/00926230590475206]
18. Matzaroglou C, Assimakopoulos K, Panagiotopoulos E, Kasimatis G, Dimakopoulos P, Lambiris E. Sexual function in females with severe cervical spinal cord injuries: a controlled study with the Female Sexual Function Index. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28:375-377. [DOI:10.1097/00004356-200512000-00014]
19. Meston CM. Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Marital Ther 2003;29:39-46. [DOI:10.1080/713847100]
20. Derogatis L, Rust J, Golombok S, Bouchard C, Nachtigall L, Rodenberg C, et al. Validation of the profile of female sexual function (PFSF) in surgically and naturally menopausal women. J Sex Marital Ther 2004;30:25-36. [DOI:10.1080/00926230490247183]
21. De la Loge C, Sullivan K, Pinkney R, Marquis P, Roux C, Meunier PJ. Cross-cultural validation and analysis of responsiveness of the QUALIOST: QUAlity of Life questionnaire In OSTeoporosis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3:69. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-3-69]

Send email to the article author

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb