Volume 8, Issue 1 (7-2010)                   IJRM 2010, 8(1): 41-44 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Motazedian S, Hamedi B, Zolghadri J, Mojtahedi K, Asadi N. The effect of sperm morphology on IUI outcome in cases with unexplained and male factor infertility. IJRM. 2010; 8 (1) :41-44
URL: http://journals.ssu.ac.ir/ijrmnew/article-1-166-en.html
1- Division of Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , sh.motazedian@yahoo.com
2- Division of Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract:   (1253 Views)
Background: Although intrauterine insemination (IUI) is one of the most common methods which is used for male factor and unexplained infertility the relative influence of various semen parameters on the likelihood of a successful outcome is controversial. Several semen parameters have been evaluated as predictors of a successful outcome with intrauterine insemination.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of sperm morphology on the success rate of IUI.
Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study of 200 couples who underwent IUI cycles of ovarian stimulation in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The patients were chosen in 2 groups group A: 100 patients with ≤20% normal sperm morphology and group B: 100 patients with >20% normal sperm morphology (unexplained infertility). The other semen parameters were normal in both groups.
Results: Total clinical pregnancies were 10.5% (pregnancy rate / cycle). There was not any difference between two groups in rate of pregnancy and also pregnancy outcome.
Conclusion: Intrauterine insemination used for treating male factor infertility has not shown excessive advantage when normal sperm morphology in semen analysis is more than 20% in comparison with ≤ 20%.
Full-Text [PDF 134 kb]   (182 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (84 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

1. Wainer R, Albert M, Dorion A, Bailly M, Berger M, Lombroso R, et al. Influence of the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated and of their morphology on the success of intrauterine insemination. Hum reprod 2004; 19: 2060-2065. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh390]
2. Hendin BN, Falcone T, Hallak J, Nelson DR, Vemullapalli S, Goldberg J, et al. The effect of patient & semen characteristics on live birth rates following intrauterine insemination: A retrospective study. J of Assisted Reprod and Genetics 2000; 17: 245-252. [DOI:10.1023/A:1009402214820]
3. Badawy A, Elnashar A, Eltotongy M. Effect of sperm morphology and number on success of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 777-781. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.010]
4. Saucedo de la E, Moraga MR, Batiza Resendiz V, Galache Vega P, Santos HR. influence of sperm morphology on results of intrauterine insemination. Gynecol Obstet Mex 2003; 71: 455-459.
5. Lee RK, Hou JW, Ho Hy, Hwu YM, Lin MH, Tsai YC. et al. Sperm morphology analysis using strict criteria as a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination . Int J Androl 2002; 25: 277. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2605.2002.00355.x]
6. Van Voorhis BJ, Barnett M, Sparks AET, Syrop CH, Rosenthal G, Dawson J. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2001; 76:1086-1087. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01783-0]
7. Dickey RP, Pyrzak R, Lu PY, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with WHO threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril 1999; 71: 684-689. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00519-6]
8. World Health Organization, labratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge university press, Cambridge, 1992.
9. Zhao Y, Vlahos N, Wyncott D, Petrella C, Garcia J, Zacur H, et al. Impact of semen characteristics on the success of intrauterine insemination. J of Assisted Reprod and genetics 2004; 21:143-148. [DOI:10.1023/B:JARG.0000031246.76666.f6]
10. Goverde AJ, MC Donnell J, Vermeiden JPW, Schats R., Rutten FFH, Schoemaker J. Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilization in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: A randomized trial and cost effectiveness analysis. The lancet 2000; 355:13-18. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04002-7]
11. Speroff L, Fritz MA. Male infertility. In: Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and infertility. Baltimore; Williams & Wilkins 2005; 30: 1135-1173.
12. Guzick DS, Carson SA, Coutifaris C, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, Steinkampt MP, et al. Efficacy of super ovulation and IUI in the treatment of infertility. N Eng J Med 1999; 340: 177-183. [DOI:10.1056/NEJM199901213400302]
13. Erdem A, Erdem M, Gumuslu S, Kulak D, Oktem M, Karabacak O. Sperm morphology before and after sperm preparation do not predict pregnancy in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles with husband sperm. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: S140-141. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.1224]
14. Westerlaken LAV, Naaktgeboren N, Helmerhorst FM. Evaluation of pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination according to indications, age, sperm parameters. J Assisted reprod genetic 1998; 15: 359-364. [DOI:10.1023/A:1022576831691]
15. Simsek F, Haydardedeoglu B, Hacivelioglu S O, Cok A, Parlakgumus A, Bagis T. Effect of cervical mucus aspiration before intrauterine insemination. International J of Gynecol & Obstet 2008; 103: 136-139. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.05.030]
16. Daya MB, Frankfurter D, Moawad G, Peak D, Dubey A, Gindoff PR. A novel semen measure for predicting post-IUI pregnancy: the absolute motile morphology count. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: S486. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.071]
17. World Health Organization, Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
18. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 112-117. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59660-5]
19. Hernandez M, Molina R, Olmedo J, Olmedo SB, Coetzee K, Estofan D, Prognostic value of the strict criteria: an Argentinian experience, Arch Androl 1996; 37: 87. [DOI:10.3109/01485019608988507]
20. Lindheim SR, Barad DH, Zinger M, Witt B, Amin H, Cohen B, et al. Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. J Assisted reprod genetic 1996; 13: 569-572 [DOI:10.1007/BF02066610]
21. Spiessens C, Vanderschueren D, Meuleman C, D'Hooghe T. Isolated teratospermia and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 1185-1189. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01172-5]
22. Ransom MX, Blotner MB, Bohrer M, Corsan G, Kemmann E. Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles? Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 303. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56522-4]
23. Kang BM, Wu TC, Effect of age on intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 93. [DOI:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00074-9]

Send email to the article author

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb