Volume 15, Issue 11 (11-2017)                   IJRM 2017, 15(11): 719-728 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Makkizadeh F, Sa'adat F. Bibliometric and thematic analysis of articles in the field of infertility (2011-2015). IJRM. 2017; 15 (11) :719-728
URL: http://journals.ssu.ac.ir/ijrmnew/article-1-904-en.html
1- School of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran. , Makkizadeh@yazd.ac.ir
2- School of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
Abstract:   (172 Views)
Background: Infertility is a disease that results in the abnormal functioning of the male or female reproductive system. Systematic research planning on any subject, including infertility is in need of solid data regarding previous efforts in this field and to identify the gaps in the research.
Objective: The aim of this research is to study the thematic structure of articles related to infertility.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study with a scientometric approach, the PubMed database was searched for research publications indexed under "Infertility" over the period 2011-2015. Specific parameters were retrieved from the PubMed. Articles about infertility were analyzed regarding the journal of publication, topics, and countries using Net draw, Ucinet and RavarPreMap software. Also, the most influential topics were analyzed by indicators in the analysis of the network: closeness centrality, and between centrality. 
Results: The growth in scientific productions the area of infertility over the mentioned period shows an upward trend with the highest growths seen in countries like the United States, the UK, Netherlands, China, and Germany. Moreover, the contents such as fertilization in vitro, adverse effects, spermatozoa, pregnancy rate, and treatment outcome were among the most frequently-used topics in the sphere.
Conclusion: Thematic analysis can provide us the research topics, important expressions, and the relationships between them. Users and policymakers can also have a better understanding of the research status in the sphere and consequently, they can plan to increase the quantity and quality of scientific productions in a more efficient way.
Full-Text [PDF 625 kb]   (63 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (17 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |
Received: 2018/01/8 | Accepted: 2018/01/8 | Published: 2018/01/8

1. Mousavi SA, Masoumi SZ, Keramat A, Pooralajal J, Shobeiri F. Assessment of questionnaires measuring quality of life in infertile couples: a systematic review. J Reprod Infertil 2013; 14: 110-119.
2. Sathiyanarayanan S, Sundar JS, Madhankumar EK, Praneetha A, Kalaiselvi S, Gopinath PM, et al. A study on significant biochemical changes in the serum of infertile women. Int J Curr Res Aca Rev 2014; 2: 96-115
3. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med 2012; 9: e1001356. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356]
4. Benyamini Y, Gozlan M, Kokia E. Variability in the difficulties experienced by women undergoing infertility treatments. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 275-283. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.10.014]
5. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software Survey: Vosviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 2010; 84: 523-538. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3]
6. Abedi Jafari H, Abuei Ardakan M, Aghazadeh F. [The process model for drawing scientific maps]. Rahyaft 2010; 46: 45-52. (In Persian).
7. Gurunath S, Pandian Z, Anderson RA, Bhattacharya S. Defining infertility--a systematic review of prevalence studies. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 575-588. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmr015]
8. Smith CA, Coyle ME, de Lacey S, Johnson NP. Evidence-based research and practice: attitudes of reproduction nurses, counselors and doctors. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 29: 3-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.014]
9. Farquhar C, Moore V, Bhattacharya S, Blake D, Vail A, Thomas J, et al. Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility. Hum Repord 2013; 28: 2883-2892. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/det334]
10. Shekofteh M, Hariri N. Scientific Mapping of Medicine in Iran Using Subject Category Co-Citation and Social Network Analysis. J Health Admin 2013; 16: 43-59.
11. Danell JAB. Reception of integrative and complementary medicine (ICM) in scientific journals: a citation and co-word analysis. Scientometrics 2014; 98: 807-821. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-013-1082-9]
12. Xie, P. Study of international anticancer research trends via co-word and document cocitaiton visualization analysis. Scientometrics 2015; 105: 611-622. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1689-0]
13. Hosaininasab SH, Makkizadeh F, Zalzadeh E, Hazeri A. The thematic structure of papers on depression treatment in PubMed from 2005 to 2014. Health Inf Manage 2016; 13: 347-353.
14. Mokhtari Shamsi M, Tavakolizadeh-Ravari M, Zalzadeh E, Baghbanian M. Predicting Basic Concepts of a Field, Based on the Factors of Oldness and Frequency Use of Subject Terms: A Case Study on Colon Cancer. Health Inf Manage 2016; 13: 354- 359.
15. Hazeri A, Makkizadeh F, Mobasheri E. Subject analysis of articles related to addiction in medline through hierarchical clustering from 1991-2014. J Health Admin 2016; 19: 47-60.
16. Horton .G, Hawkins M. A content analysis of intervention research in social work, doctoral dissertations. J Evid Based Soc Work 2010; 7: 377-386. [DOI:10.1080/15433710903344066]
17. Lee PC, Su HN. Quantitative mapping of scientific research-the case of electrical conducting polymer nanocomposite. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2011; 78: 132-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.002]
18. Danell, JAB. Reception of integrative and complementary medicine (ICM) in scientific journals: a citation and co-word analysis. Scientometrics 2014; 98: 807-821. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-013-1082-9]
19. Zhang W, Zhang Q, Yu B, Zhao L. Knowledge Map of Creativity Research Based on Keywords Network and Co-word Analysis, 1992-2011. Qual Quant 2015; 49: 1023-1038. [DOI:10.1007/s11135-014-0032-9]
20. Xie P. Study of International Anticancer Research Trends via Co-word and Document Co-citation Visualization Analysis. Scientometrics 2015; 105: 611-622. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1689-0]
21. Hou Q, Mao G, Zhao L, Du H. Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis. Int J life Cycle Ass 2015; 20: 541- 555. [DOI:10.1007/s11367-015-0846-2]
22. Borgatti SP, Everett, MG. A Graph-Theoretic Perspective on Centrality. Social Networks 2006; 28: 466-484. [DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005]
23. Chen C, Ibekwe-SanJuan F, Hou J. The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2010; 61: 1386-1409 [DOI:10.1002/asi.21309]
24. Price DJD. Little science, big science. Columbia University Press. New York: London. 1963; 314-316.
25. Kikhaee F. the Study of Structure and Subjects Trends of Article related to the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in PubMed. [M.A. Thesis], Yazd, Yazd University, Faculty of social Science 2015.
26. Bazm S, Kalantar SM, Mirzaei M. Bibliometric mapping and clustering analysis of Iranian papers on reproductive medicine in Scopus database (2010-2014). Int J Reprod Biomed 2016; 14: 371-382.
27. Zhang Y, Xiao F, Lu S, Song J, Zhang C, Li J, et al. Research trends and perspectives of male infertility a bibliometric analysis of 20 years of scientific literature. Andrology 2016; 4: 990-1001. [DOI:10.1111/andr.12204]
28. Gupta DK. Bibliometric and structural study on in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Annual Lib Sci Doc 1987; 34: 52-59.
29. Garfield E. Scientography mapping the tracks of science Current contents. Soc Behav Sci 1994; 7: 5-10.
30. Okhovati M, Zare M, Zare F, Bazrafshan MS, Bazrafshan A. Trends in Global Assisted Reproductive Technologies Research: a Scientometrics study. Electron Physic 2015; 7: 1597-1601. [DOI:10.19082/1597]
31. Ashkenazi J, Farhi J, Dicker D, Feldberg D, Shalev J, Ben-Rafael Z. Acute pelvic inflammatory disease after oocyte retrieval: adverse effects on the results of implantation. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 526-528. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56587-X]
32. Bello FA, Akinajo OR, Olayemi O. In-vitro fertilization, gamete donation and surrogacy: perceptions of women attending an infertility clinic in lbadan, nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health 2014; 18: 127-134.
33. Hanneman, R., Riddle, C. Introduction to Social Network Methods 2005; Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside. Available at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2018 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb