Volume 4, Issue 1 (7-2006)                   IJRM 2006, 4(1): 19-22 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print

1- Montaserieh IVF Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , n_m_farr@yahoo.com
2- Montaserieh IVF Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract:   (811 Views)
Background: It has been demonstrated that performing a mock embryo transfer (ET) significantly improves the pregnancy rate in IVF cycles. The mock ET could be performed prior to the stimulation cycle or immediately before real ET. The problem of the first procedure is the possibility of variation in the uterine position and or cervico–uterine angle.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the consistency of the type of ET in mock ET prior to the treatment cycle with real ET.
Materials and Methods: A prospective comparison between the technique of mock embryo transfer and real embryo transfer. One hundred and sixty treatment cycles on 141 patients between January 2003 and September 2004 ended to ET and they were analyzed prospectively. In each cycle, patients underwent a mock ET in mid luteal phase prior to treatment cycle (the date when patients referred to have consultation about down regulation regimen).
Results: Of 160 mock ET the Wallace catheter passed easily in 144 (90%) of them. In the remaining 16 cycles (10%) a tenaculum and or a rigid cannula had to be used. From 144 cases of easy mock ET, real ET was easy in 121 (84%) cases while 23 (16%) cases had difficultly during real ET. In the 16 cases of difficult mock ET, there was 8 cases (50%) of difficult real ET and 8 cases (50%) of easy real ET (p=0.001, χ2=10.67). The overall clinical pregnancy rate for both difficult and easy transfer was 35%. The pregnancy rate for easy real ET was  37.2% and for difficult real ET was 25.87%. Despite of the difference, the statistical analysis shows no significance difference (χ2=1.21). The difference between mean age for both difficult and easy real transfer was not significant.
Conclusion: Mock ET before beginning of the treatment cycle is highly consistent with real ET.
Full-Text [PDF 132 kb]   (186 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (42 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

1. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA. Optimizing the embryo transfer technique. Hum Reprod 2002;17: 1149-1153. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.5.1149]
2. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour G. Dummy embryo transfer, a technique that minimizes the problem of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990; 54:678-681. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53829-1]
3. Sharif K, Afnan M, Lenton W. Mock embryo transfer with a full -bladder immediately before the real transfer for in-vitro fertilization treatment: the Birmingham experience of 113 cases. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1715-1718. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136161]
4. Brinholz JC. Ultrasound visualization of endometrial movements. Fertil Steril 1984; 41:157- 158. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47560-6]
5. Henne MB, Mikke AA. Uterine position at real embryo transfer compared with mock embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2004;19: 570-572. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh116]
6. Ijland MM, Evers JL, Dunselman GA, Van Halwijk C, Lo CR, Hoogland HJ. Endometrial wavelike movements during menstural cycle. Fertil Steril 1996; 65:746-749. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58207-7]
7. Poindexter AN 3rd, Thompson DJ, Gibbons WE, Findley WE, Dodson MG, Young RL. Residual embryo in failed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1987; 46: 262-267. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)49523-3]
8. Dorn C, Reinsberg J, Schlebrusch H, Preitl G, Van der Ven H, Krebs D. Serum oxytocin concentration during embryo transfer procedure. Eur J Obstet Gynecal Reprod Biol 1999; 87: 77-80. [DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00077-9]
9. Lesney P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Rolrinson J, Maguiness SD. Embryo transfer and uterine junctional zone contractions. Hum Reprod Update 1996;5:87-88. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/5.1.87]
10. Lesney P, Killick SR, Robinson J, Raven G, Maguiness SD. Junctional zone contraction and embryo transfer: is it safe to use a tenaculum. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2367-2370. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.9.2367]
11. Leeton J, Trounson A, Jessup D, Wood C. The technique for human embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1982; 38: 156-161. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46451-4]
12. Visser DS, Fourie FL, Kruger HF. Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: effect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993; 10:37-43. [DOI:10.1007/BF01204438]
13. Tur-Kapsa I, Yuval Y, Bider D, Levron J, Shulman AJD. Difficult or repeated embryo transfer does not adversely affect in vitro fertilization pregnancy rate or outcome. Hum Reprod 1998;13: 2459-2455. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.9.2452]