Volume 11, Issue 6 (9-2013)                   IJRM 2013, 11(6): 447-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Modarresi T, Sabbaghian M, Shahverdi A, Hosseinifar H, Akhlaghi A A, Sadighi Gilani M A. Enzymatic digestion improves testicular sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermic patients. IJRM. 2013; 11 (6) :447-0
URL: http://journals.ssu.ac.ir/ijrmnew/article-1-427-en.html
1- Department of Andrology at Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Embryology at Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health at Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Andrology at Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran , masadighi@gmail.com
Abstract:   (549 Views)
Background: In patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), vital spermatozoa from the tissue is obtained from testes by enzymatic treatment besides the mechanical treatment.
Objective: To increase the sperm recovery success of testicular sperm extraction (TESE), with enzymatic digestion if no sperm is obtained from testis tissue by mechanical method.
Materials and Methods: Tissue samples were collected from 150 men who presented with clinical and laboratory data indicating NOA by means of TESE and micro dissection TESE methods. Initially, mature spermatozoa were examined for by mechanical extraction technique shredding the biopsy fractions. In cases whom no spermatozoa was observed after maximum 30 min of initial searching under the inverted microscope, the procedure was followed by enzymatic digestion using DNaseI and collagenase type IV. Surgery type, pathology, AZF, karyotype, hormones and testis size were compared in patients.
Results: Of 150 cases with NOA, conventional mincing method extended with enzymatic treatment yielded successful sperm recovery in 13 (about 9%) patients. Comparison of parameters revealed that level of FSH and LH were significantly different (p=0.04 and 0.08 respectively) between two groups that response negative and positive to enzymatic digestion.
Conclusion: The combination of conventional TESE and enzymatic digestion is an effective method to recover spermatozoa. The benefit of the mincing combined with enzyme to sperm retrieval for NOA firstly shorten the mechanical searching time, leading to minimizing further cellular damage as well as exposure to external conditions, and secondly reduce the number of cases with sperm recovery failures. Also, the serum level of FSH and LH are factors that influence the chance of sperm retrieval.
Full-Text [PDF 246 kb]   (65 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (64 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

1. Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Miyagawa Y, Tohda A, Miura H, Nishimura K, et al. Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2924-2929. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/17.11.2924]
2. Tournaye H, Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Lissens W, Van Steirteghem A. Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a new effective approach to infertility as a result of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 1045-1051. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56754-5]
3. Craft I, Tsirigotis M. Simplified recovery, preparation and cryopreservation of testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 1623-1626. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136142]
4. Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. A review of ten years experience of ICSI. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10: 19-28. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmh004]
5. Ezeh UI, Moore HD, Cooke ID. A prospective study of multiple needle biopsies versus a single open biopsy for testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3075-3080. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.11.3075]
6. Rosenlund B, Kvist U, Ploen L, Rozell BL, Sjoblom P, Hillensjo T. A comparison between open and percutaneous needle biopsies in men with azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 1266-1271. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.5.1266]
7. Vanderzwalmen P, Zech H, Birkenfeld A, Yemini M, Bertin G, Lejeune B, et al. Intracytoplasmic injection of spermatids retrieved from testicular tissue: influence of testicular pathology, type of selected spermatids and oocyte activation. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1203-1213. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.6.1203]
8. Seo JT, Ko WJ. Predictive factors of successful testicular sperm recovery in non-obstructive azoospermia patients. Int J Androl 2001; 24: 306-310. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2605.2001.00307.x]
9. Schlegel PN, Palermo GD, Goldstein M, Menendez S, Zaninovic N, Veeck LL, et al. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia. Urology 1997; 49: 435-440. [DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00032-0]
10. Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 131-135. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/14.1.131]
11. Amer M, Ateyah A, Hany R, Zohdy W. Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 653-656. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/15.3.653]
12. Crabbe E, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem A. The use of enzymatic procedures to recover testicular germ cells. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1682-1687. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.8.1682]
13. Blanchard Y, Lavault MT, Quernee D, Le Lannou D, Lobel B, Lescoat D. Preparation of spermatogenic cell populations at specific stages of differentiation in the human. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 30: 275-282. [DOI:10.1002/mrd.1080300316]
14. Salzbrunn A, Benson DM, Holstein AF, Schulze W. A new concept for the extraction of testicular spermatozoa as a tool for assisted fertilization (ICSI). Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 752-755. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019248]
15. Fischer R, Baukloh V, Naether OG, Schulze W, Salzbrunn A, Benson DM. Pregnancy after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of spermatozoa extracted from frozen-thawed testicular biopsy. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 2197-2199. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019075]
16. Crabbe E, Verheyen G, Silber S, Tournaye H, Van de Velde H, Goossens A, et al. Enzymatic digestion of testicular tissue may rescue the intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle in some patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2791-2796. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.10.2791]
17. Ezeh UI, Moore HD, Cooke ID. Correlation of testicular sperm extraction with morphological, biophysical and endocrine profiles in men with azoospermia due to primary gonadal failure. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3066-3074. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.11.3066]
18. Soderstrom KO. Tubular hyalinization in human testis. Andrologia 1986; 18: 97-103. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0272.1986.tb01746.x]
19. Aydos K, Demirel LC, Baltaci V, Unlu C. Enzymatic digestion plus mechanical searching improves testicular sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 120: 80-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.10.009]
20. Ramasamy R, Reifsnyder JE, Bryson C, Zaninovic N, Liotta D, Cook CA, et al. Role of tissue digestion and extensive sperm search after microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 299-302. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.033]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb