Volume 11, Issue 3 (5-2013)                   IJRM 2013, 11(3): 209-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khadivzadeh T, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Bahrami M, Taghipour A, Abbasi Shavazi J. The influence of social network on couples’ intention to have the first child. IJRM. 2013; 11 (3) :209-0
URL: http://journals.ssu.ac.ir/ijrmnew/article-1-401-en.html
1- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Patient safety and Health Quality Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , latifnejadr@mums.ac.ir
3- Nursing and Midwifery Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4- Health Sciences Research Center, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
5- Department of Demography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (823 Views)
Background: Recently, the relevance of social interactions as determinants of behavioral intentions has been increasingly perceived, but there is a lack of knowledge on how and why it interacts with couples’ fertility intentions.
Objective: This qualitative study was conducted to explore the influence of social network on couples’ intention to have their first child in urban society of Mashhad, Iran in 2011.
Materials and Methods: In this exploratory qualitative study in-depth interviews were conducted with 24 participants including 14 fertile women, two parents, three husbands and five midwives and health care providers. The sample was selected purposively in urban health centers, homes and workplaces until data saturation was achieved. Data analysis was carried out adopting conventional content analysis approach through giving analytical codes and identification of categories using MAXqda software. Study rigor verified via prolonged engagement, validation of codes through member check and peer debriefing.
Results: Findings from data analysis demonstrated four major categories about social network’s influence on couples’ intention to have their first child including 1) perception of fertility relevant social network, 2) occurrence of various types of social influence 3) subjective judgment to the benefits of social network and its fitness to personal life, and 4) couples’ interaction with social network.
Conclusion: Managing the fertility behaviors need to include the consideration of personal social networks surrounding the couples. It is important to apply the study findings in providing family planning services and dissemination of appropriate fertility behaviors through community-based reproductive health care delivery system.
Full-Text [PDF 632 kb]   (136 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (112 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article |

1. Siegel JS, Gendell M, Hoover SL. A generation of change: a profile of America's older population. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1993.
2. Callan VJ. The impact of the first birth: Married and single women preferring childlessness, one child or two children. J Marriage Family 1986; 48: 261-269. [DOI:10.2307/352393]
3. Buber I, Fliegenschnee K. Are you ready for a Child? A Methodological. Triangulation on Fertility Intentions in Austria. Vienna Institute of Demography Working Paper 3/2011. Available at: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/ vid/download/WP2011_03.pdf.
4. Petch J, Halford WK. Psycho-education to enhance couples' transition to parenthood. Clin Psychol Rev 2008; 28: 1125-1137. [DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.03.005]
5. Kohler HP, Bühler C. Social Networks and Fertility. in NJ Smelser and PB Baltes (eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon; Elsevier Sciences: 2001.
6. Keim S, Klärner A, Bernardi L. Qualifying Social Influence on Fertility Intentions: Composition, Structure and Meaning of Fertility-relevant Social Networks in Western Germany. Cur Soc 2009; 57: 888-890. [DOI:10.1177/0011392109342226]
7. Behrman JR, Kohler HP, Watkins SC. Social networks and changes in contraceptive use over time: Evidence from longitudinal study in rural Kenya. Demography 2002; 39: 713-737. [DOI:10.1353/dem.2002.0033]
8. Santelli J, Rochat R, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Gilbert BC, Curtis K, Cabral R, et al. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003; 35: 94-101. [DOI:10.1363/3509403]
9. Emirbayer M, Mische A. What is Agency? Am J Soc 1998; 103: 962-1032.
10. Barker RL. The social work dictionary. 4th Ed. Washington DC; NASW Press: 1999.
11. Granovetter, MS. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. Am J Soc 1985; 91: 481-510.
12. Kendall C, Afable-Munsuz A, Speizer I, Avery A, Schmidt N, Santelli J. Understanding pregnancy in a population of inner-city women in New Orleans-results of qualitative research. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 297-311. [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.007]
13. Mitchell JC. Networks, Norms, and Institutions. in J. Boissevain, JC Mitchell (eds). Network Analysis- Studies in Human Interaction. The Hague; Mouton: 1973.
14. Coleman JS. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. Am J Soc 1988; 94 (Suppl.): S95-S120.
15. Portes, A. Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Ann Rev Soc 1998; 24: 1-24. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1]
16. Arai L. Peer and neighborhood influences on teenage pregnancy and fertility: Qualitative findings from research in English communities. Health Place 2007; 13: 87-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.10.003]
17. Bernardi L. Channels of Social Influence on Reproduction. Pop Res Policy Rev 2003; 22: 527-55. [DOI:10.1023/B:POPU.0000020892.15221.44]
18. Barber JS. Intergenerational influences on the entry into parenthood: Mothers' preferences for family and non-family behavior. Social Forces 2000; 79: 319-348. [DOI:10.1093/sf/79.1.319]
19. Manlove J. Early motherhood in an intergenerational perspective: The experiences of a British cohort. J Marriage Fam 1997; 59: 263-297. [DOI:10.2307/353469]
20. Steenhof L, Liefbroer AC. Intergenerational transmission of age at first birth in the Netherland for birth cohorts born between 1935 and 1984: Evidence from municipal registers. Popul Stud (Camb) 2008; 62; 69-84.
21. Bernardi L, Keim S, von der Lippe H. Social Influences on Fertility, A Comparative Mixed Methods Study in Eastern and Western Germany. J Mixed Methods Res 2007; 1: 23-47. [DOI:10.1177/1558689806292238]
22. Iranian Statistic Center. Presidency Deputy, Strategic Planning and Monitoring Detailed results of Mshhad 2006 population and housing census 2006. Available at: http://www.spac.ir.
23. Polit DF, Beck CT, Hungle BP. Essential of nursing research methods, appraisal and utilization. 6th Ed. Lippincott; Philadelphia: 2006.
24. Peddie VL, Teijlingen EV. Qualitative research in fertility and reproduction: Does it have any value? Hum Fertil (Camb) 2005; 8: 263-267.
25. Iranian Statistic Center. Presidency Deputy, Strategic Planning and Monitoring Detailed results of Mshhad 2011 population and housing census. Available at: http://www.spac.ir & www.khorasan.ir.
26. Hsieh HF, Shanon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005: 15: 1277-1288.
27. Kondracki NL, Wellman NS, Amundson DR. Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav 2002; 34: 224-230. [DOI:10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60097-3]
28. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills CA; Sage: 1985.
29. Bernardi L, Lippe H, Keim S. Mapping Social Influence on Fertility: a Mix-Method Approach to Data Collection. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research WORKING PAPER WP 2005-015 MAY 2005. Available at: http://www. demogr.mpg.de/papers/working/wp-2005-015.pdf.
30. Baghiani Moghadam BM, Aminian AH, Abdoli AM, Seighal N, Falahzadeh H, Ghasemi N. Evaluation of the general health of the infertile couples. Iran J Reprod Med 2011; 9: 309-314.
31. Liefbroer AC, Rijkin AJ. Influences of the family of origin on the timing and quantum of fertility in the Netherlands. Population Studies. Popul Stand (Camb) 2009; 63: 71-85.
32. Anderton DL, Tsuya NO, Bean LL, Mineau GP. Intergenerational transmission of relative fertility and life course pattern. Demography 1987; 24: 467-480. [DOI:10.2307/2061386]

Send email to the article author

© 2021 All Rights Reserved | International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb